Author Archives: The Richard A. Maxwell Sport Media Project

Unknown's avatar

About The Richard A. Maxwell Sport Media Project

The Richard A. Maxwell Sport Media Project is a hub for teaching, research, and service related to sport media. The Project benefits students and faculty at Bowling Green State University, and offers outreach and media consulting to area and regional groups that work with student-athletes. Through collaborative efforts of the Sport Management program and the School of Media and Communication, BGSU students have the opportunity to learn such skills as sports writing, reporting, broadcasting, announcing, public relations, media relations, communication management and production. Faculty and other scholars have access to resources about the commercial and sociological aspects of sport.

Michaels and Collinsworth Keep Audience ‘Glued’ to TV

BY DANE WINDISCH

Whenever the New England Patriots and New York Jets square off in a primetime game such as the one Sunday night, there are sure to be a lot of fireworks. The commentators for Sunday night were the usual tandem of the great Al Michaels and Cris Collinsworth with Michelle Tafoya doing the on-field reporting. The entire broadcast from pre-game to halftime to the final whistle was an excellent broadcast, in my opinion, because of how positive Michaels and Collinsworth are for the duration of game.

Michaels is one of the most influential broadcasters of all time. He is also one of the most recognizable because of the most famous Olympic games ever, the 1980 USA Hockey team victory over the Soviet Union. For as long as Michaels has been broadcasting, he still shows the same type of enthusiasm and knowledge into every broadcast he does. While I was watching the game studying his language and timing after each play, what stands out to me is how well he does his commentary in a business-like fashion.

During the pre-game, Michaels gives great insight on the major story lines going into the game such as: Tom Brady and the Patriots last-ranked defense, the Jets being on a hot streak, and an array of facts and statistics involving the game. During pre-game commentary, Michaels and Collinsworth went through the years of the Jets and Patriots rivalry dating back to when Bill Parcells was with the Pats, the beginning of the Tom Brady era, the controversial ‘Spygate’ with Bill Belichick, and the recent Jets victory over the Patriots in last year’s playoffs. Even if you are not a fan of football and did not know any history about the Jets and Patriots, the broadcast at least showed you into the past and present for the simplest of football fans to gain knowledge.

Sunday Night Football’s halftime presentations are always watchable because the commentators go through the earlier action of the day, talk about some of the main story lines and Bob Costas has a special presentation. This night, the special presentation was on the Chicago Bears’ Devin Hester who added another punt return TD, his 12th, adding to his NFL record.

The game ended with a blowout in the Patriots favor and, in doing so, snapped the Jets three-game win streak. The Patriots won 37-16. Even though, at the very end, the game was getting out of hand and seemingly unwatchable, Michaels and Collinsworth did an excellent job keeping the audience glued to the television.

Unlikely Duo of Breen and Burke Works for College Hoops

BY ADAM KUFFNER

Two commentators were in positions they are not used to being in for Friday night’s game between Belmont and Duke on ESPNU, the season opener for both teams. Mike Breen called the play-by-play for this game. Breen, an NBA commentator for ESPN, stepped into the college basketball world Friday with the NBA Lockout still looming over professional basketball. However, the change of scenery didn’t affect Breen as he called a great game.

Doris Burke also found herself in a different position. She has been seen on ESPN doing play-by-play and sideline reporting for college football and college basketball games. Friday, she served as color commentator alongside Breen. The analysis for Friday’s game was the best I have ever seen out of Burke. She was very thorough in every analysis, adding how certain players have improved from last year. Speaking with comfort and confidence, it seemed as if this was a natural position for Burke. I think the sport of college basketball and the position of color analyst is the right position for Doris Burke. Remembering games where she was play-by-play for college football, I felt as if she seemed out of position. She fits better in an analyst role whether it is in the booth or on the sidelines.

On the production side, ESPNU highlighted Duke Coach Mike Krzyzweski inching closer to Bob Knight’s record of career wins (902). During the telecast, flashbacks of monumental Krzyzweski wins were shown; moreover, a member of the United States military mentioned how Coach K has inspired his leadership techniques. This piece fit perfect with Coach K being a former point guard at Army along with Friday being Veterans’ Day. Also, to make the production better, I noticed ESPN has added a “Bonus” section to its scoreboard under each team’s score. This brand new feature will be used to notify viewers when each team is in the penalty to shoot free throws on non-shooting fouls.

Duke, ranked 6th in the nation on the AP poll to start the season, pulled off a close 77-76 victory over a scrappy Belmont team who will be one of the top mid-major teams in the nation this year. The Blue Devils victory gives Coach K win number 901 in his career; he is now one victory away from tying his former coach, Bob Knight, for the career win mark in Division I Men’s college basketball. The Coach K storyline along with two commentators who stepped into different roles excelled to make the broadcast a success.

Breeders’ Cup Classic

BY MATTHEW OSTROW

The commentary for the Breeders Cup was spot-on and even exceeded my expectations for the telecast.  The team of Joe Tessitore, Randy Moss and Jerry Bailey did a great job setting the stage for the race as well as making you feel like you were at Church Hill Downs. The commentators made the event seem historical and classy like horse racing should be.

I am not a huge horse racing fan, but I tune in for the Triple Crown races. So, my knowledge for horse racing is very limited.  That makes the job for the commentator more difficult because the majority of the audience must be informed of the basics of horse racing compared to an NFL game were most of the audience is very familiar with the sport.  The commentators did a great job of informing you of how long the race is and what course conditions can do to affect the race. 

The broadcast also had great personal stories about the jockeys.  The biggest story was the jockey of Game on Dude, Chantal Sutherland.  She was trying to become the first female jockey to win the Breeder’s Cup and the commentators did a great job framing the story for the audience.

Then came the race. If you have ever seen a horse race, you know the horses change place constantly and it is very hard to tell what is going on. The telecast did a great job helping the audience know what is going on by having a helpful graphic at the bottom showing who was in first, second and third. Along with the graphic, Tessitore added to the excitement and said the horses’ names with what place they were in and said who was winning, in order, quickly. For example, he would say, “Game on Dude, Game on Dude,” followed by, “Drosselmeyer, Drosselmeyer making a move, Drosselmeyer!”. That style of commentary made me more excited and kept me informed about the race.

At the end of the race, Drosselmeyer barely beat out Game on Dude and the jockeys turned out to have dated, which was a interesting fact that they provided.  The post-game coverage was good, reporters on horse caught up to the winner and runners-up right after the race to get their reactions.

The broadcast for the Breeders Cup Classic did a great job at informing the audience about horse racing, making the race exciting and keeping its historical feel.

‘Skip Tebow’ Gets the Job Done

BY NATE DOOLIN

Any sports fan who thinks of ESPN sport analyst Skip Bayless immediately thinks of his “against the grain” stubborn persona he displays so well during his debates on ESPN’s First Take. Although some of his arguments are biased when he is asked to debate certain topics, Skip is one of the most entertaining sport analysts.

Say what you want about the man’s outlook on sports, but the way he prepares himself for his job every day is commendable. Skip does his research every night by studying games, contacting outside sources, outlining his debate points, and practicing his screen presence before each and every show he participates in. Not to mention his inherent skill to be able to keep the audience engaged. Skip’s screen presence during every show of First Take is always very entertaining to watch. Whether he is taking up the challenge of debating a famous athlete he has once criticized publicly face-to-face or trying his hardest to trump Stephen A. Smith, another very entertaining and credible ESPN sport analyst, Skip is always willing to put on a show and give his audience exactly what they are looking for.

As I have stated before, to add to Skip’s effective screen presence, he also takes his job very serious, which is something I respect. The preparation and research he puts into every topic he talks about always shows its shining face. For instance, Skip is a staunch supporter of Tim Tebow no matter how much flak he takes from other analysts for it. He stands behind Tebow through thick and thin just like any other Tebow fan would. But, the difference between he and others who love the rookie quarterback is that he deconstructs his performances (both good and bad) and bases his support from the evidence he has come up with. Skip makes great points about all of Tebow’s 4th quarter performances that have either brought his team wins or put them in great position to get the job done. I also can respect Skip’s loyalty to the statements he makes. If Skip makes a mistake, he will stand by that and stand corrected, which believe it or not is not easy to do in front of the masses of sports fans who tune in to his show on a regular basis.

Skip may not think like a typical sports analyst and he also may not approach most topics the same way, but isn’t that the reason why we are so intrigued to hear what he has to say? Without people like Skip, who bring entertainment and share a different perspective on a situation instead of the sugar-coated norm, sports talk would simply be plain and vanilla to listen to. In other words, as long as he knows how to put on a show, “Skip Tebow” is alright with me.

Big Ten Commentator Showed Bias

 BY NATE DOOLIN

The game coverage consisted of three commentators, one of which was on the field. Danielle Slaton covered the on-field reporting and usually commented on coach reactions and player injury reports. It was obvious she could listen to the broadcast in the booth as they asked her to comment a few times without actually cutting to her.

The camera angle of the majority of the game covered a 1/4 of the field at a time. Based on the observation of the camera views, there must have been at least three cameras present. The staff had good transitional camera cuts to the players during a pause in play. The cameras never cut to the audience and were all placed on the same side of the venue. It was obvious the cameras were not of the best quality.

The commentators gave more background of each team and player rather than the actual activities of the game. If you were to view a Champions League game, you would hear more play-by-play announcing. Class rank was said over and over again about each player. They were really concerned with distinguishing what year in school each player was.

Broadcaster Dan Kelly obviously seemed to side with Penn State. He got more excited when they were in the box compared to Minnesota. He used the phrases like, “Minnesota had their work cut out for them and that is where the problem is for Minnesota.” He took a liking to athletes Taylor Schram and Maya Hayes from Penn State. He gave them the most attention on ball touches, more so than others. His voice elevated several times when Schram had the ball even if she was not in the scoring opportunity. Minnesota was in the box several times and never got consistent support from the commentators.

I saw numerous Big Ten logos throughout the facility and one clearly marked on the field. I think the Big Ten Network did a great job advertising their brand.

Tuesday Telecast is On-point

BY DANE WINDISCH

On the day after Halloween, Northern Illinois and Toledo gave viewers a chance to see the highest scoring non-overtime game in Mid-American Conference history. Northern Illinois scored on a 4-yard touchdown pass with 19 seconds to go to prevail over Toledo 63-60 in a game where both teams combined for 123 points, 1,124 yards from scrimmage, eight lead changes, and a remarkable 17 touchdowns.

Dave Lamont and former Heisman Trophy winner Tim Brown were the play-by-play announcers for the night and they did a great job and captured the excitement that occurred in Toledo, Ohio. College Football Primetime on Tuesday nights typically is reserved for small market, mid-major match-ups which don’t normally receive national exposure. It is their chance to be on ESPN. I personally enjoy watching MAC football games because of the small cities they come from and how the city is captured as part of the broadcasts. In the Halloween spirit, ESPN had cameras go in some haunted houses at the Lucas County fairgrounds and throughout the game viewers saw different footage of various Halloween themes.Lamont and Brown did a great job incorporating some Halloween words into game action.

For the majority of the game, the announcers’ primary player they featured was receiver Eric Page from Toledo, who was arguably the best player on the field. I think when viewers see a Tuesday night college football game on, they either watch because of a big-time matchup or a big-time player. Eric Page was the main reason people tuned in to watch NIU and Toledo. I did not see anything wrong with this because he was the most exciting and top player in the game. Tim Brown talked about Page’s ability to play in the NFL and whenever Page made a great play, he gave insight into why Page’s footwork, speed, or cutting ability was good enough for the NFL. I think one of the reasons Tim Brown was doing the broadcast was to give viewers his insight and expert opinion on Eric Page.

Dave Lamont really finished the broadcast of the game with some great lines that made you look back at the game. His final line of the night came after he rattled off the numbers from the game and finished with, “Goodnight from Toledo” which was a great way to end the broadcast for a Tuesday Night college football game, in my opinion.

Chargers v. Chiefs Telecast an ‘Overall Success’

 BY ADAM KUFFNER

In arguably the most exciting Monday Night Football game of the year, the Kansas City Chiefs were given new life thanks to a Philip Rivers botched snap in the closing minutes of regulation. Ryan Succop kicked a game-winning field goal in overtime to give Kansas City the victory at home 23-20.

Although I always enjoy ESPN’s production of Monday Night Football, there is a slight change I would like to see. That change deals with the pre-game show. The Monday Night Football “Launch” starts at 8:30 p.m. and is a preview for the game. However, Monday Night Countdown is on before the Launch, so there is no need to delay the game for more pre-game discussion. ESPN broadcasts the game to start at 8:30 p.m, but kickoff does not actually happen until 8:40 p.m. My suggestion is to start the “Launch” at around 8:20 p.m.; therefore, kickoff would be scheduled for 8:30 p.m. CBS has this type of pre-game. “First on the Field” happens roughly 10-15 minutes before kickoff. The announcers talk briefly about the teams, and kickoff is set for 1 p.m. This is a great method to use because people who just want to watch the game can turn on the television right when the game is advertised to begin to see the kickoff at 1 p.m.

On another note, it is disappointing to see Hank Williams Jr. not open up the broadcast. His voice has always been a huge part of the telecast, but I understand ESPN’s reason to cut ties with him. Nonetheless, a piece of the Monday Night Football puzzle is missing.

Other than that, I really enjoyed this Monday Night Football telecast. Mike Tirico is fantastic doing the play-by-play. You can tell the excitement in his voice when a big play happens. Analysts Ron “Jaws” Jaworski and ex-NFL head coach Jon Gruden are excellent for the broadcast. “Jaws”, a former player, usually provides analysis from a player’s perspective. On the other side, Gruden uses his past coaching experience to analyze everything going on throughout the game. Also, watching and listening to Gruden, one can tell the passion he has for the game of football. Whether he is praising a player or criticizing a player, Gruden’s passion can be heard in every analysis he makes. Gruden is not afraid to speak his mind, and he always backs up what he says when making critical statements.

Monday Night Football is the NFL’s biggest stage week after week throughout the regular season. This week’s exciting game combined with the excellent production work by ESPN proved the telecast to be an overall success. 

No TV Mute for Wiltsie in Lions v. Broncos Matchup

BY ANDREW WILTSIE

In this matchup, we find the resurgent Detroit Lions traveling to Sports Authority Field to take on the struggling Denver Broncos, led by their exciting second-year quarterback, Tim Tebow. The level of anticipation of this game was particularly high on both sides with Detroit looking to bounce back after dropping their previous two games with dismal performances, and Tebow making his first home start of the season. Excitement was in the air. The broadcasting team for this game was FOX Sports broadcasters Dick Stockton and former Denver Broncos’ safety, John Lynch.

I cannot stand the Tebow fad that is going on, so I was skeptical going into this game on how the commentators would be, especially when I found out a former Bronco would be part of the broadcast team. Given the hype and anticipation behind Tebow’s first home start, I was quite pleased with the commentating done for this game (this could be in part due to Detroit dominating the game). Stockton mainly focused on the play-by-play portion of the commentating and did a good job at bringing some emotion into his broadcast. Lynch took on a coach-like persona during the broadcast and analyzed the action that took place. I may be biased, but it seemed as though he took a particular interest in the Denver Broncos, specifically Tebow. The focal point of the broadcast, for the most part, was Tebow, which would normally disgust me, but, due to the nature of the game, most comments were in fact negative toward him. Stockton and Lynch would both take jabs at Tebow’s throws, pocket awareness, but mainly his decision-making. Two instances that stood out to me involved Tebow: The first was when he threw horribly toward a receiver late in the first quarter and Lynch went on a small rant about his ability to navigate the pocket and make the throw. The second involved Tebow scrambling for a 15-yard gain late in the game and he was up-ended by Detroit safety, Louis Delmas, which sent him flying feet-over-head. Both commentators then took the time to seemingly coach Tebow on how an NFL quarterback should not risk himself that way, but they then retracted somewhat and said that is how he is and maybe that is how he should play. Beyond comments involving Tebow,  not much was directed toward the Broncos during this broadcast.

When looking at Detroit, there have been numerous accounts of dirty play from the Detroit defense following a loss from the Atlanta Falcons. So, during the beginning of the broadcast, we heard a lot about the issues surrounding Matt Ryan’s injury and the controversy that followed. An early portion of the broadcast also focused on Matthew Stafford and his ankle injury, which occurred the prior week, but those comments focused on how well he looked playing and how much his ankle appeared to be bothering him. Aside from comments either praising the play of Calvin Johnson or talking about the controversy involving Detroit’s “Dirty” Defense, the commentary toward Detroit was relatively positive and somewhat playful. The biggest example of this came following a sack of Tebow by Lions’ linebacker Stephen Tolloch. Tolloch went down to a knee and “tebowed” which is a new fad started by Tebow himself. The commentators both took this as a playful joke amongst players and laughed it off the way it should have been. But, in the days following, the media has put a negative spin on the whole joke saying that Tulloch was mocking Tebow’s religion, which is a complete joke. Tulloch was just having fun with the whole fad and the media is just trying to keep the bad boy persona going for Detroit.

As a whole, this broadcast was well done, in my view. If anything, I feel they could have done a better job on keeping the coaching down and more on the broadcast in general. It is nice to get insight every now and again, but Lynch seemed to scrutinize every mistake made by the Broncos. Overall, this was an exceptional broadcast, far from the typical broadcast, which require my TV to be put on mute.

World Series: Game 6

By Matt Ostrow

The two commentators on call for Game 6 of the World Series between the Rangers and the Cardinals were Joe Buck and Tim McCarver. It was an amazing back and forth game that fans enjoyed. The commentators did an average job, but there were multiple things that took away from such a great game.

Joe Buck did the play-by-play and, at times, was the only one speaking for almost the whole half of an inning. Buck was also very unemotional during very exciting plays that had me running around my apartment. For example, when Adrian Beltre for the Rangers hit a home run in the top of the 7th inning, making it a 5-4 lead for the Rangers, with no emotion, Buck said, “that one is gone, the Rangers now lead.” The job of the commentator is to capture the moment with emotion. It was a huge home run in the scope of the game and he needed to show more excitement with a play of such magnitude.

The other big issue I had with Buck’s commentary was that for a big part of the game, he would not even comment on the plays happening in the game, but talked about Pujols and his future. For almost the whole top of the 8th inning Buck talked about Pujols and free agency. He completely ignored the pitches being thrown by the Cardinals pitcher and only commented on the actual game if their was an out recorded or the ball was put in play. I understand Pujols is one of the best players in baseball and his future is important, but that conversation should not be happening during Game 6 in the top of the 8th inning. Those conversations need to happen pre-and post-game. Also, the coverage felt pretty unfair because most of the conversations were about how great of a comeback story the Cardinals were even when the Rangers were ahead 7-4 in the 8th inning and about to clinch the World Series.

Buck did do some things well, though. He gave many good statistical comparisons between the two teams or similar players. Another thing he did that was beneficial to the fan was: every time a new player entered the game he talked about how they came to be on their current team.

Tim McCarver rarely spoke, but when he did he had good insights into the game of baseball. When there were big plays, McCarver would explain why that call was made by the manager. I really enjoyed his analysis of the big plays and what possibly the player or manager could have done.

There were some things that Fox did well in producing the game. There were great replays of big plays with multiple angles and speeds. There also were a lot of great shots showing the managers reacting to big plays throughout the game. Something Fox did poorly was, it played the same song that they play for Sunday football and it totally does not fit the emotions of baseball.

The most memorable moment of the commentary was when Freese hit the walk-off home run in the 11th inning and Buck said, “We will see you tomorrow night.” This was not only a a great phrase to use, but is an honor to his late father, Jack Buck, who used that same phrase in 1991 when Kirby Puckett hit a walk-off home run in Game 6 of the World Series. A walk-off is always a special moment no matter what, but that call by Joe Buck made it even more memorable.